Company of Heroes 3: Relic Admits They Bit Off More Than They Could Chew

When Company of Heroes 3 first debuted its ambitious dynamic Italian campaign, players and critics alike were captivated by the potential of a Total War-style World War II experience. However, the final product struggled to find its footing, ultimately leaving the community with a “mixed” reception on Steam. Recently, Relic Entertainment CEO Justin Dowdeswell provided a candid look at why the studio’s most ambitious project didn’t quite land as intended.

The Struggles of the Company of Heroes 3 Dynamic Campaign

The core vision for the game was to create the biggest entry in the franchise to date, featuring more factions and two distinct, massive campaigns at launch. According to Dowdeswell, the sheer scale of these goals proved to be a significant hurdle. While the team was energetic and the creative spirit was high, the technical realization of the dynamic map turned into a persistent stumbling block.

• Ambitious Scope: The studio aimed for a level of complexity that exceeded their production timeline.
• Development Stumbling Blocks: The dynamic Italian campaign proved difficult to polish, resulting in gameplay that often felt static rather than reactive.
• Technical Hurdles: The push for a massive launch scope led to unpolished performance and bugs that hindered the player experience.

Reflecting on Development Realities

Dowdeswell admitted that the team operated under the hope that the disparate elements of the game would coalesce in the final stages of production—a common occurrence in the industry. Unfortunately, the necessary polish for the Company of Heroes 3 campaign never fully materialized before the release date. The studio acknowledged that they simply “bit off more than they could chew” while trying to innovate on the RTS formula.

The idea was great. The spirit of it was good. The team was energised. It was just more than we could get done in time. — Justin Dowdeswell, CEO of Relic Entertainment

Looking Ahead: The Legacy of a Mixed Experiment

Despite the challenges faced by the dynamic campaign, the game wasn’t a total loss. The traditional, linear campaign and the core RTS combat mechanics remained highly praised, keeping the game afloat with solid, albeit split, reviews. For fans of the genre, the situation serves as a stark reminder of the risks involved in pushing the boundaries of established franchises.

Ultimately, while Company of Heroes 3 might be remembered as a “failed experiment” in its attempt to reinvent the campaign structure, it remains a testament to the risks developers take in the name of innovation. Moving forward, the focus remains on learning from these gaps in polish and ensuring that future updates better meet the high standards expected by the franchise’s dedicated player base.

Source: Read Original Article